Senior IRGC Officers Reportedly Killed In Israeli Attack In Syria

For years, Iranian administrations have not transparently disclosed their oil revenues, citing the illicit nature of shipments under the US sanctions regime. However, in the past two months, the Raisi government has released some statistics on oil revenues, labeling it the 'transparency of the Raisi administration.

Mohammad Rezvani-Far, the Head of Iran Customs Administration (IRICA), stated on December 27, that during the first 9 months of current Iranian fiscal year, the country's oil exports totaled $26.46 billion, electricity exports were $300 million, and technical and engineering services exports were approximately $780 million.

He referred to the total foreign trade of the country during this period as $112 billion, stating that $63 billions of this amount is related to the total exports of the country, including oil, electricity, and services.

At the same time, Ehsan Khandouzi, the Minister of Economic Affairs and Finance, also confirmed these figures.

Confirmation comes while the figures presented by Minster Khandouzi and the Head of the Central Bank of Iran last month indicated that the total exports of oil, electricity, and services of the country in the first 8 months of the current fiscal year (March 2023 to November 2023) were about $20 billion.

From the official statements of the Raisi administration, it is understood that the average monthly exports of oil, electricity, and services in the first 8 months were $2.5 billion, but suddenly in the 9th month of the Iranian calendar, it surged to over $7.5 billion.

Statistics from industry monitoring firm Kpler show that the volume of Iran's oil exports in the past month not only did not grow compared to previous months but it showed a notable decrease.

Also, tanker tracking companies' statistics show that Iran exports 1.25 million barrels per day of crude oil and gas condensate as well as more than 200 thousand barrels of petroleum products (mazut and kerosene) during the current fiscal year.

The nominal price of Iranian oil is between $80-$85 according to OPEC statistics. Thus, Iran's oil export revenues should have been about $34 billion in the nine-month perios, but the statements of the Head of Customs and the Minister of Economy indicate that this figure is $26.46 billion.

The reason for this lies in Iran's extensive discounts to Chinese oil refineries and the cost of circumventing sanctions, especially middlemen, who arrange the illicit Iranian shipments to China by various methods, including mixing Iranian crude with shipments from other countries, thus hiding their origin.

Iran also barters some of its oil with Chinese goods. However, this amount is included in the country's oil export figures.

The Customs statistics in China show that from April to November (approximately the first 9 months of the Iranian calendar year), China imported about $2.6 billion of non-oil goods and $5.5 billion of exports to Iran. Thus, about $3 billion of Iran's oil exports to China during this period were spent on bartering with Chinese goods.

In the process of bartering oil with goods, a significant part of the value of Iran's oil is wasted due to the costs of dealers and intermediaries.

Service Exports And The Country's Trade Balance

UN statistics show that in 2017, before the US imposed sanctions, Iran had nearly $10 billion in annual service exports, the majority of which was transportation, personal travel, construction services as well as business travel. Iran's service imports were $17 billion as well.

The latest statistics from the Iran Trade Development Organization show that the country's service exports reached just $2.3 billion in 2021, and some scattered statements by Iranian officials indicate that this figure was about $4 billion last year. Now, the statements of the head of Iran Customs show that in the first 9 months of this year, this figure has dropped to $780 million. He did not explain why the country's export of services suddenly plummeted.

The Central Bank of Iran does not separately publish statistics on the export and import of services, but it publishes the statistics of the trade balance of services (the difference between service exports and imports), which has always been around negative five to six billion dollars in recent years.

The head of customs and the minister of economy, without mentioning the existence of the annual negative balance of five to six billion dollars for services, only referred to the statistics of service exports, oil, and non-oil goods and claimed that during the 9 months, the total foreign trade balance of the country was a positive $15 billion.

In other words, in the calculations of these senior officials, Iran had a total of $63 billion in oil, non-oil, and service exports during this period, but only imported $49 billion in goods. The figures presented by the two senior officials of Ebrahim Raisi administration only include the import of goods and do not include petroleum products imports (gasoline), as well as service imports, and it cannot be claimed that the foreign trade balance was a positive $15 billion during this period.

Capital Flight

Central Bank statistics show that, considering oil, non-oil and service trade, Iran's net capital account was a negative $15 billion last Iranian year (March 2022-March 2023). In other words, the outflow of foreign currencies from the country was $15 billion more than the inflow of foreign currencies.

Central Bank statistics show that the country had about $100 billion negative capital account during 2011-2021.

Part of this situation is due to the large gap in the balance of trade in services, but a significant part of it is also due to the efforts of the people to take their capital out of Iran and buy property in foreign countries, especially Turkey, the Emirates, and Western countries.

Reports from the Turkish Statistical Institute show that in recent years, Iranian have been the top buyers of homes in this country. Since the US imposed sanctions against Iran in 2018, Iranians have purchased about 39,000 homes in Turkey.

The purchase of houses and properties is just one facet of capital flight from Iran. Owing to the unfavorable economic prospects within the country, Iranian citizens have embarked on substantial capital investments, diversifying into various forms of real estate and assets abroad.

In an op-ed published by the Wall Street Journal Thursday, Bennett, who was prime minister from June 2021 to June 2022, admitted that Israel was behind attacking an Iranian base and the assassination of a senior IRGC commander in 2022.

Calling on Israel and the US to topple the Iranian regime, he described the Islamic Republic as “the source of endless war, terror and suffering throughout the world.” He called it inexplicable that almost nobody is taking on Tehran, which has been “at the center of most of the Middle East’s problems and much of global terror.”

Israel rarely admits publicly to attacking Iran directly, but Bennett wrote, "After Iran launched two failed UAV attacks on Israel in February 2022, Israel destroyed a UAV base on Iranian soil. In March 2022, Iran’s terror unit attempted to kill Israeli tourists in Turkey and failed. Shortly thereafter, the commander of that very unit was assassinated in the center of Tehran."

Hassan Sayyad-Khodaei, a member of IRGC’ Quds Force, was the deputy commander of Unit 840 and in charge of its operations in the Middle East and countries neighboring Iran.

On December 25, a senior IRGC commander, Razi (Reza) Mousavi, was killed by an alleged Israeli airstrike in Syria, for which Iranian officials have threatened that Israel would pay a high price.

"The US and Israel must set the clear goal of bringing down Iran’s evil regime. Not only is this possible. It is vital for the safety and security of the Middle East—and the entire civilized world," Bennett concluded in his piece.

State media in Iran announced the tariff increase after weeks of speculation about a price hike of as high as 100 percent.

Iran has a vibrant ecommerce sector, that might face losses because of higher Internet rates, which could also push overall inflation higher.

Minister of Communications and Information Technology, Issa Zarepour, had hinted at the possibility of an impending internet tariff hike during a government meeting earlier in the month.

This price surge comes as Iran has some of the strictest internet access regulations globally, with users experiencing low-quality connections and being forced to pay for expensive Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) and anti-filtering software to avoid the censorship imposed by the government.

The authorities in the Islamic Republic have extensively blocked many messaging apps, social media networks, and websites. They are also in the process of establishing a "National Internet," similar to China. Internet restrictions tend to intensify during widespread protests in the country.

Mohammad-Javad Azari-Jahromi, the former Communications Minister, expressed concerns, saying, "The result of the price hike is apparently clear; the end of this spiral will lead to securing the economic interests of satellite internet providers and widening the [political] gap between the people and the government."

Last week, Faraz Daily reported that Internet companies in Iran had petitioned the government to increase their broadband and mobile tariffs by 100 percent.

The latest move will force people to buy and use Chinese and Iranian cell phones, likely also to cause a monopoly for certain importers with strong lobbying power amidst Iran's global sanctions, and in turn, raising prices.

Peyvast, an Iranian monthly periodical covering the latest developments in information and communication technologies, reported that six years ago, the Iranian government aimed to make a similar decision by conditioning the importation of cell phones on obtaining an official permission from their foreign producers. However, at that time, Tehran decided that such a policy would not be feasible due to international sanctions.

It is not clear what has encouraged the Islamic Republic officials to revive their former plan as both sanctions and the unwillingness of the main cell phone manufacturers to trade with Iran are still in place. The tech website “Sakhtafzar Mag” took to task the ministry’s decision, saying it can have “heavy consequences for the cell phone market” in Iran.

By removing “different layers” of the market, this law runs the risk of undermining competition and after-sales services, Sakhtafzar Mag warned.

Zoomit, an online tech and gadget magazine, noted that as a result of the government’s new importation policy, the cell phone market in Iran may become similar to the country’s car market where overpriced Chinese productions abound with unsatisfactory after-sales services.

The publication warned that Iran has turned into a monopolized market for Chinese brands after the Islamic Republic forbade the registration of iPhone 14 & iPhone 15 in an alleged attempt to retaliate US bans and to prevent foreign currency from leaving Iran.

According to the magazine, after the ban on iPhone and the inability of a large part of the Iranian population to buy Samsung products over their high prices, Chinese brands such as Huawei, Xiaomi, Realme, Oppo, OnePlus and ZTE are taking control of the market.

The government’s bans on the registration of iPhone and its propaganda to show iPhone users as luxurious and “west-stricken” run counter to the fact that many of high-ranking Iranian officials and their children use the American brand. Last year, the photo of slain Quds Force Commander Qasem Soleimani’s daughter holding the latest iPhone 13 led to a storm of criticism that overshadowed the second anniversary of her father’s death.

Hundreds of social media posts scorned Soleimani for brandishing a phone that costs more than ten times the monthly salary of an ordinary worker in Iran while the Islamic Republic bases its propaganda on Qasem Soleimani’s modest lifestyle.

The government has already spent millions of dollars on the production of Iranian cell phones, causing concerns over safety and security in a regime where internet restrictions and surveillance have become commonplace.

According to reports, the Islamic Republic follows China’s lead in systematic oppression techniques as China’s large-scale efforts to control the internet has become a viable conceptual and technical model for authoritarian regimes. 

Abdollahi was moved to solitary confinement on Tuesday, heightening anxiety among his family and loved ones in light of his death sentence.

The Hengaw Human Rights Organization, a Kurdish rights group, expressed deep concern over the transfer and the imminent danger of his execution, calling for an "immediate halt to this action and a review of his case in line with international standards of justice."

Abdollahi was among a group of seven Sunni prisoners who were detained in 2009 and were transferred to the detention center of the intelligence agency in Urmia (Orumiyeh) City. They were transferred to Tehran several months later. They were tried in 2015, and subsequently sentenced to death. These sentences were confirmed by the Supreme Court in 2020, after years of legal battles. Two of Abdollahi’s co-defendants, Ayub Karimi and Qasem Abasteh, were hanged in November.

The charges against them include "War against God," "corruption on earth," "support for Salafi groups," and the alleged "murder" of Abdolrahim Tina, who was killed by unidentified assailants in September 2008. However, in letters published by human rights organizations in recent years, the accused consistently denied these accusations.

Ahmadreza Haeri, a political prisoner, wrote from prison, "The entire trial did not last more than two minutes. Judge Moghiseh said first, you are a Kurd! Second, you are Sunni! Third, you have Salafi beliefs! These are the three reasons for the execution."

Iran has hanged nearly 750 people this year alone, according to the latest report by the US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA).