Iran International
The action taken against an elderly man for dancing and singing in public has drawn media criticism of the Iranian government's crackdown on people's lifestyle choices.
“Why are you so upset by people’s happiness … Why are you so obsessed with [displaying] sorrow and tears [instead of happiness],” Fayaz Zahed, a sociology professor at Tehran University, asked the authorities in a commentary. “The [Iranian] society is tired, worn out, and sad. Let it be happy for a little while, even if [the feeling] is a lie, make-believe, and fleeting one.”
The spirited seventy-year-old man, Sadegh Bagheri, known locally as Sadegh the Trumpeter, has become a symbol of suppressed happiness and resistance against the regime's imposed lifestyle. Social media is flooded with videos of individuals, both young and old, mimicking his dance in solidarity.
A female fishmonger and her customers dancing in a market in Khuzestan
Dancing is considered debauchery by religious fundamentalists, categorizing it as wholly unacceptable behavior. After the Islamic Revolution, the term "synchronized movement" was introduced to replace the Arabic loanword "raqs," which had been used for centuries in Persian vernacular and literature to refer to dance.
The fundamentalist religious establishment, closely connected to political hardliners, strongly opposes most forms of music, especially lively pop music associated with dance. Consequently, dancing has become a form of protest against the regime, with families of government violence victims sharing dance videos on social media.
Accordingly, dancing has come to serve as a form of protest against the regime and families of the victims of government violence often post videos of their dancing on social media.
Video clip showing dancing and singing of victims of government violence
Zahed pointed out that Iranian society today is even sadder, more depressed, and in crisis than two decades ago when he previously wrote about the lack of happiness due to the authorities' lifestyle restrictions.
Earlier this month, Bagheri had a few thousand followers on Instagram. His followers are now increasing by the minute and have reached one million since Iran's Internet Police shut down his Instagram account for a few days for sharing less than a dozen videos of his happy dancing and singing.
One of these videos that showed him singing in his native Gilaki language outside his fishmonger’s shop at the fish market of Rasht, a northern Iranian coastal city had recently become very popular on social media.
People dancing in the fish market of Tonekabon in support of Bagheri
Authorities removed all content from Bagheri's page, along with a dozen other accounts sharing his videos, citing "criminal content" despite the absence of political or explicit lyrics in the songs. Reports suggested arrests, but Bagheri's page has since been restored, and he claims he was not arrested.
“We have done something that the dancing and singing of fishmongers has come to be considered an act of resistance [against the regime],” the conservative Farhikhtegan newspaper wrote Monday in an editorial entitled “How To Make Guerillas Out Of Singers” about the many dance videos constantly being made and posted on social media in defiance of the authorities. “Honestly, this is a feat!” the editorial said sarcastically.
“Those who shut down Sadegh Booghi’s account are not familiar with the [social] mechanism. They are happy that they have fulfilled their [religious] duty because they seem to think they have brought the representative of global imperialism to its knees in the Rasht market [by stopping the dancing].
Tweet unavailable
The case involves Hamid Nouri, a key figure implicated in the 1988 massacre of Iranian political prisoners, a massacre that left thousands dead and many more scarred for life. While the appeal court's verdict is still pending, it's worth reflecting on the trial's significance and what it represents for justice, human rights, and the pursuit of accountability.
The 1988 massacre of political prisoners in Iran is a tragedy that should never have happened. It is a stain on the pages of history, a moment when the world should have stood up and cried out against the unspeakable atrocities that took place. But justice was elusive for decades. Families of the victims longed for answers, and survivors carried the physical and emotional scars of that horrendous period.
Fast forward to November 2019, when the Swedish authorities arrested Hamid Nouri, a man alleged to have played a pivotal role in the 1988 massacre. Sweden's decision to act under the principle of universal jurisdiction was a beacon of hope for those who had waited for justice for 35 years. It was a reminder that justice knows no borders, that human rights are universal, and that those responsible for heinous crimes must be held accountable, no matter where they hide.
The subsequent trial in Sweden was not just a legal proceeding; it was a message to the world that the pursuit of justice and accountability remains steadfast even decades later. It demonstrated the power of international law to reach across time and distance to hold individuals accountable for crimes against humanity. The trial was a symbol of solidarity with the victims and survivors of the 1988 massacre, their pain acknowledged, and their voices heard.
As we await the verdict from the Swedish appeal court, we should take a moment to commend Sweden for its commitment to justice, human rights, and the rule of law. By conducting this trial, Sweden has exemplified the principles of international justice and demonstrated that no one is above the law. It has shown that nations can play a crucial role in holding perpetrators accountable for their actions, even when their crimes were committed in a different time and place.
We also thank the Swedish government for its dedication to upholding human rights. By pursuing this case, Sweden has sent a clear message to the international community that justice is not a mere concept but a tangible, achievable goal. It has provided a glimmer of hope to countless victims of human rights abuses worldwide, reminding them that they, too, can seek justice.
The road to justice can be long and arduous, but it is a journey worth embarking upon. As the appeal court's verdict approaches, let us remember that it represents not just a legal outcome but a triumph of humanity over cruelty. Regardless of the final judgment, Sweden's commitment to this trial is a testament to the enduring importance of accountability and justice. It is a beacon of hope for all those who have suffered and reminds us that the pursuit of justice is a cause worth fighting for.
In the end, whether the appeal court confirms the life sentence or not, one thing is certain: December 19, 2023, will be a day to remember, not just for Sweden but for all those who believe in the power of justice and accountability to heal wounds, restore dignity, and build a more just and humane world.
This opinion article was submitted by Laleh & Lawdan Bazargan, sisters of Bijan Bazargan one of the victims of the 1988 Massacre, and Plaintiffs in Hamid Nouri’s Case.
Opinion expressed by the authors are not necessarily the views of Iran International.