Iran's President Pezeshkian bruised by hardliners' blitz on cabinet

“Iran does not purchase its security; it builds it,” he said, arguing that its independence comes at a cost Tehran has long been willing to pay. "Iran has demonstrated that dependence on others is not only a risk but also a strategic mistake."

He said the country has chosen a path of self-reliance, avoiding the risks that come with dependence on shifting geopolitical alliances, highlighted last week in the very public spat at the Oval Office between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and US President Donald Trump over Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

"Maintaining independence comes at a cost, and Iran has always paid that price. Since the early days of the Islamic Revolution, economic pressures, sanctions, military threats, and proxy wars have all been designed to turn Iran into a submissive player in the international system," he wrote.

"The recent dispute at the White House between Donald Trump, J.D. Vance, and Volodymyr Zelensky was not just an ordinary disagreement; it revealed deepening fractures at the core of the international system."

Following the heated exchange, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s office reposted his 2022 remarks warning against reliance on the West.

Banners reflecting this message have also appeared across Tehran, featuring phrases such as “End of the mirage” and “Leaning on the wind.”

The column pointed to shifting dynamics in Ukraine, where Zelensky—once reliant on Western aid—now challenges US leadership directly.

“Even small allies are realizing that their dignity comes at a cost,” he added.

Although Iran produces many types of weapons, its arsenal is technologically inferior to Western and many Russian weapons. Iran does not have an effective air force, and despite Araghchi's claim of independence buys many weapons systems from others, such as Russia.

Since Friday's clash, many Iranian hardliners have said that the Trump-Zelensky blowout validates Khamenei’s opposition to negotiations with the United States.

Citing Khamenei’s early February speech, in which he declared negotiations with the Trump administration would not be “wise, expedient, or dignified,” they argue that Trump's confrontational exchange with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office should serve as a warning to those who question Khamenei’s stance.

Araghchi’s comments about self-reliance contrast with the reality that the general population in Iran is experiencing.

With over 40 percent inflation, skyrocketing prices, and the devaluation of the national currency, one-third of the population has fallen below the poverty line—something that, according to many, the officials of the Islamic Republic never experience in their own lives.

“Iran will never remain silent in the face of baseless remarks,” he told Jam-e Jam daily, responding to Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan’s recent comments to Al Jazeera in which he accused Iran of risking regional disorder.

Iran was a key backer of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who was ousted in December by a Turkish-supported Islamist-led rebel alliance. “If this policy continues, I don’t think it will be good,” Fidan said.

Iran has also backed groups including Lebanese Hezbollah, Hamas in Gaza and the Houthis in Yemen for decades with financial aid and weapons.

"If you are trying to cause anxiety in a third country, other countries can also disturb you by supporting groups in your own country," Turkey's foreign minister added.

Velayati rejected that Iran was destabilizing the Middle East, saying, “Iran is a powerful country with an ancient civilization that has always worked for regional security and cooperation.”

He cautioned Turkish officials against repeating “unrealistic and interventionist claims” and stressed that engagement and dialogue define Iran’s approach, but added that Tehran will respond to any criticism.

Iran's foreign ministry summoned Turkey's ambassador, state TV reported on Tuesday, following Fidan’s comments.

Without using the term ‘summoning’, the Iranian foreign ministry confirmed that Ambassador Hicabi Kırlangıç met with Mahmoud Heydari, the ministry's Director General for the Mediterranean and Eastern Europe, on Monday.

"The common interests of the two countries and the sensitivity of regional conditions require avoiding wrongful comments and unreal analyses that could lead to differences and tensions in our bilateral relations," Heydari said.

Elsewhere in his remarks, Velayati warned against Israel for what he alleged as attempts to divide Syria, saying that “the groundwork for disintegration has already been laid,” citing rival factions including Kurdish groups, Alawites, and militant groups.

Iran's Shiite clerical government became deeply involved in Syria's civil war early in the conflict, sending regular and proxy forces to defend Bashar al-Assad's rule.

Iran, which invested heavily in Assad’s survival—spending at least $30-$50 billion—now faces the challenge of recalibrating its strategy. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has vowed on multiple occasions to reclaim Iran’s influence in Syria, adding further tension to an already complex situation.

Turning to Europe, Velayati predicted the European Union’s eventual collapse, citing deepening divisions over Ukraine.

“This is one of the worst periods for Europe since NATO’s founding,” he said. He argued that Europe’s dependence on the US had left it politically vulnerable, saying that “in the end, Europe will submit to America.”

On Trump’s stance in the Ukraine war, Velayati said Washington was pursuing an “empire in the Western Hemisphere” while seeking cooperation with Russia to avoid disruption to its plans.

“However, in the Eastern Hemisphere, countries like China, Iran, and even Saudi Arabia will not easily bow to such dominance,” he added.

Economy Minister Abdolnaser Hemmati was impeached by Parliament while Vice President for Strategic Affairs Javad Zarif resigned under pressure last week.

Hardliners accused Hemmati of failing to curb rising prices, inflation, and the devastating devaluation of Iran’s rial, while Zarif faced criticism over his family members' US citizenship. Pezeshkian had strongly defended both men.

The key question in Iranian newspapers on Monday was, "Will hardliners stop here?" Some outlets predicted that attacks on Pezeshkian and his government would continue.

Political commentators speaking to Persian-language media outside Iran said that anyone in Pezeshkian's position would have resigned almost immediately.

Inside Iran, however, commentators remained silent or were too intimidated to voice opinions that could be seen as undermining the government's integrity or sowing discord among officials.

What media, commentators, and politicians in Iran did not say was that Hemmati was impeached for economic problems rooted in Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s refusal to negotiate with the United States to address Iran’s chronic economic crisis. While many have acknowledged in recent months that US sanctions are the primary driver of Iran’s economic hardships, they have consistently avoided blaming Khamenei for the situation.

Even Pezeshkian and Hemmati, who detailed Iran’s deep economic problems in their speeches at the Majles, avoided explicitly naming Khamenei as the culprit. However, Pezeshkian made it clear: "I wanted to negotiate with the United States, but Khamenei forbade negotiations, and therefore, I said we won't negotiate."

That statement alone was damning. Pezeshkian was desperately trying to convey to the nation that the suffering was not his fault. From Khamenei’s perspective, shifting the blame to the economy minister helped absolve the Supreme Leader of responsibility for prolonging the country’s financial hardships.

With Khamenei dominating the country's political and media landscape, Pezeshkian has little room to further defend himself. He is likely to be left isolated, facing intensified attacks from hardliners who oppose his presidency and have never hidden their desire to unseat him.

The pro-reform website Fararu quoted former government spokesman Ali Rabiei as saying, "Pezeshkian has more difficult days ahead of him."

Other reformists, including cleric Mohammad Ali Abtahi, a former aide to President Mohammad Khatami, criticized Pezeshkian for his attempts to unify with hardliners. Abtahi argued that Pezeshkian appointed ultraconservatives to key positions in his government without securing their support for his administration.

Tehran's former mayor Gholam Hossein Karbaschi, who is currently the proprietor of centrist Ham Miham daily, wrote: "The hardliners will be further emboldened if Pezeshkian does not object and keeps giving concessions to ultraconservatives."

Karbaschi advised Pezeshkian that "There should be a limit to the idea of national reconciliation." He added that Hemmati's impeachment was a factional move and is not likely to bring about any improvement in the country's economic situation." He explained that the "ultraconservatives always held a grudge against Hemmati since June 2021 when he was competing with ultraconservative figureheads Saeed Jalili and Ebrahim Raisi as presidential candidate and questioned their understanding of the country's economy."

Referring to "the failure of national reconciliation as Pezeshkian's main project," proreform Rouydad24 warned the Iranian President: "Reconciliations with others in power has failed. Think of reconciling with the people."

“I personally believed it would be better to negotiate [with the US], but the Supreme Leader said we will not talk with the US. So I said we would not negotiate with the US. It was done and over with, it was done and over with,” Pezeshkian said, his tone possibly reflecting frustration, during a speech in Parliament on Sunday. He was attending the session as lawmakers debated the impeachment of his economy minister, Abdolnaser Hemmati.

This marks the first time an Iranian president, while still in office, has openly acknowledged a significant policy disagreement with Khamenei on a matter of dire national importance.

At a press briefing on Monday, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei emphasized that Pezeshkian’s remarks were clear and meant that his government would adhere to "policies ordained by the top officials of the country"—a phrase commonly understood to refer to Khamenei.

A mission derailed?

When the reform-leaning Pezeshkian was unexpectedly allowed to run in the June snap presidential election, many speculated that his candidacy was intended to facilitate negotiations with the US while also serving as a scapegoat if the talks failed.

"Pezeshkian was supposed to be the president who negotiated with the US," political commentator Sahand Iranmehr wrote on X, arguing that after Trump’s election, Iran’s real decision-makers reversed course. According to Iranmehr, Pezeshkian’s speech in Parliament reflected a leader whose mission had been completely erased—a man who now appears aimless, sidelined, and even ashamed.

There are also some speculations that Pezeshkian’s candid admission of his disagreement with Khamenei was a deliberate—perhaps desperate—attempt to shift responsibility for the consequences of refusing negotiations onto the Supreme Leader himself.

By publicly acknowledging his stance, Pezeshkian may have sought to make it clear that if the economic and political crisis worsens, it will be Khamenei and the hardliners opposed to negotiations rather than his government who should bear the blame.

Fallout from Pezeshkian’s admission

On Sunday, the hardline-dominated Parliament voted to remove Pezeshkian's reformist economy minister. Hours later, he also lost his strategic affairs deputy, Mohammad-Javad Zarif, a figure despised by hardliners for advocating diplomacy with the US.

In an X post, Zarif announced his resignation, stating that he was stepping down on the "advice" of Chief Justice Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejei. Pezeshkian has yet to officially accept his resignation.

Due to the sensitivity of the issue, most politicians and commentators in Iran have refrained from directly commenting on Pezeshkian’s remarks. Instead, they have either quoted him verbatim or expressed disappointment in vague terms.

However, ordinary Iranians—many posting anonymously on social media or sending recorded messages to Iran International TV—have been far more direct in their criticism and many say he should resign now that he has realized he has no power to deliver his election promises, including resolving the issue of sanctions through direct talks with the US.

“It was you who mocked [Saeed] Jalili [in election debates] saying nothing could be done unless sanctions were lifted. Now you are saying you wanted to negotiate but will not do so because Ali Khamenei says no,” one of the angry citizens said in a recorded messages sent to Iran International.

Others who had hoped Pezeshkian would break the deadlock over sanctions expressed deep disillusionment. A businessman in Tehran, speaking anonymously to Iran International, said voting for Pezeshkian had been "the last chance" for him and many others who had hoped change could come through elections.

"With the possibility of sanctions worsening due to Khamenei’s obstinacy, things that are already bad could spiral into something much worse. When all hope is lost, a countdown to the public’s complete disillusionment with the regime will begin, possibly in the next few months," he warned.

Khamenei’s history of blocking US negotiations

Khamenei has a long history of obstructing presidents who sought negotiations with the US. However, his stance has not always been absolute. While he denied permission to Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani and Mohammad Khatami, he allowed secret talks with US officials in Oman from 2013-2015 that resulted in the JCPOA nuclear deal.

“Rafsanjani advocated talks with the US but was not given permission. Neither did Khatami. Mahmoud [Ahmadinejad] was allowed but he wasn’t taken seriously [by the other side]. Then there was Rouhani who managed to make the nuclear deal but denied permission to continue. Raisi tried secretly for three years but failed. And Pezeshkian said today that he wants negotiations but [is forbidden]… and the story will continue,” wrote Ghorbanali Salavatian, a reformist public figure and Iran-Iraq War veteran, in an X post.

The directive, reported by Tasnim News Agency on Sunday, mandates dedicated online portals for immediate publication of non-confidential financial data including information on financial policies, loan facilities, and regulatory directives.

It also ordered banks and non-bank credit institutions to establish units to handle public inquiries within a strict 10-day deadline.

Aimed at bolstering public trust and accountability, the move comes in response to repeated violations of the Law on Publication and Free Access to Information, according to the CBI.

The CBI said that inspections reveal banks are consistently failing to comply with transparency laws, adding that this undermines public trust and hinders access to crucial financial information.

The measure comes as Iran slides to 151st out of 180 countries in Transparency International's 2024 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI).

The CPI, which assesses perceived public sector corruption, shows Iran's continued decline, with a score of just 23 out of 100. The index highlights concerns over bribery, misuse of public funds, and limited access to information.

In October 2023, a report by the World Bank placed Iran among the worst countries in the world in terms of Worldwide Governance Indicators, with a Voice and Accountability Index score of -1.45, placing it among the lowest for political participation, free expression, and media freedom."