Israeli strike on Evin prison was 'war crime,' Human Rights Watch says

A senior figure from Iranian Kurdish parties in Sulaymaniyah told Iran International that “one of the topics discussed between Iran and Iraq during Ali Larijani’s trip to Baghdad was the increase of pressure and further restrictions on Kurdish parties.”

Separately, an opposition figure based in Erbil said that “after Larijani’s visit to Iraq, sources in the Kurdistan Regional Government warned all parties that if Israel attacks the Islamic Republic again, the likelihood of threats from Iran against the Kurdistan Region and these parties is serious.”

Both sources confirmed to Iran International that “in the event of a possible next Israeli attack on Iran, the Islamic Republic will react against the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.”

On Wednesday night, Iraq’s National Security Advisory issued a statement saying that the document signed between Baghdad and Tehran during Larijani’s trip was a “security memorandum of understanding for cooperation on border affairs and confronting Iranian Kurdish opposition.”

The statement noted that Iraq already had a security protocol with Iran, signed in March 2023, known as the Joint Security Agreement. That agreement covered “border security and measures to neutralize the activities of Iranian Kurdish opposition forces present in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.”

According to the advisory, the memorandum signed this week was the result of earlier coordination to convert the existing protocol into a formal memorandum of understanding with the same content, including “matters concerning the five Iranian Kurdish opposition parties.”

The statement added that the document was prepared before recent hostilities between Israel and Iran, had been approved by Iraq’s Council of Ministers, and was signed during Larijani’s visit in the presence of Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani.

The advisory stressed that “there is no security agreement between the two countries; rather, it is a security memorandum of understanding.”

According to information obtained by Iran International, another goal of Larijani’s trip was to encourage Shi’ite factions to push for parliamentary approval of a Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) bill.

The PMF, or Hashd al-Shaabi, is an umbrella organization of Shi’ite militias formed under the direct supervision of Qasem Soleimani, the late commander of the IRGC Quds Force.

In March 2025, the Iraqi parliament introduced draft legislation seeking to reform the PMF by placing it more firmly under the authority of the prime minister as commander-in-chief, explicitly aiming to limit external influence, including from Iran.

The reported flight diversion comes amid strained ties between Tehran and Damascus following the ouster of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad late last year. His successor, Ahmed al-Shara, has criticized Iran’s military role in Syria as destabilizing.

Iran International could not independently verify the Israeli media report on the flight route.

Larijani, secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, arrived in Beirut on Wednesday for meetings with senior Lebanese officials, including President Joseph Aoun, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem.

Aoun told Larijani that no group in Lebanon should bear arms or seek foreign support, warning against interference in the country’s internal affairs.

Larijani responded that Iran respects decisions taken by the Lebanese government and does not interfere in its domestic matters.

During his visit, Larijani reaffirmed Tehran’s backing for Lebanon and its “resistance” against Israel – a term he used to refer to Tehran-backed groups such as the Shi’ite group Hezbollah, and offered assistance in reconstruction efforts.

The visit came days after Lebanon’s cabinet instructed the army to present a plan to disarm Hezbollah by the end of August, a move Tehran has publicly opposed.

Lebanon’s foreign ministry last week condemned remarks by a senior Iranian official rejecting the disarmament plan as “unacceptable interference.”

In a joint letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the Security Council, the three countries confirmed they are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism if diplomatic efforts stall.

“We have made it clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism,” the ministers wrote.

In a separate article, British foreign minister David Lammy told the Jewish News that the group has offered Iran a limited extension to UN sanctions relief subject to clear conditions.

Among those is Iran resuming negotiations with the US and ensuring full cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency.

“The UK has long been clear that Iran’s nuclear program is a threat to international peace and security, with its failure to produce credible assurances regarding the nature of the program," Lammy said.

The E3 said their offer “remained unanswered by Iran” and warned they would act if no deal or extension was secured before the deadline. “Iran still has the choice to resume diplomacy, and we urge Iran to do so,” Lammy said. “The ball is now in Iran’s court.”

Talks in Istanbul last month aimed at securing compliance ended without agreement. Sanctions relief, granted under the 2015 nuclear deal, is due to expire in October. The United States withdrew from the agreement in 2018 during President Donald Trump’s first term, reinstating all US sanctions.

The E3 maintain they are committed to using “all diplomatic tools” to ensure Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon, which Tehran insists it is not seeking.

Foreign ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei told state media that UN rights experts had warned such actions were particularly worrying because Israel is the only holder of nuclear weapons in the Middle East.

He said the experts compared the reported assaults to the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which mark their 80th anniversary this year.

In a post on the social media platform X, Baghaei said the UN rapporteurs had expressed “deep concern” over attacks in Gaza and warned that Israel’s strikes against several neighbors, including recent attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, undermine stability across the region.

The UN experts condemned the attacks in June, saying, “These attacks represent a flagrant violation of fundamental principles of international law, a blatant act of aggression and a violation of jus cogens norms—peremptory rules of international law from which no derogation is permitted.”

On June 13, Israel launched land and air strikes targeting senior Iranian military leaders, nuclear scientists, and politicians, while damaging or destroying Iranian air defenses and nuclear facilities. Iran retaliated with missile and drone attacks on Israeli cities and military sites. On the ninth day of fighting, the United States bombed three Iranian nuclear sites. Iran then struck a US base in Qatar.

A US-brokered ceasefire was reached on June 24. Both sides claimed victory, with Israel and Washington saying they had significantly degraded Iran’s missile and nuclear programs -- claims Tehran denied. Independent assessments remain limited due to the secrecy surrounding Iran’s nuclear activities.

“Dear friends, who else attacked your country besides Israel?" Larijani told reporters in Beirut on Wednesday. So be careful that Israel does not impose something else on you through other means."

"Do not let it use other forms of pressure to force on you what it could not achieve through war. Do not mistake friend for enemy; resistance is your national asset,” he added.

Larijani said that Iras no intention in interfering in the affairs of Lebanon.

His remarks come a week after the Lebanese government ordered the army to devise plans by the end of the year to disarm the Iran-backed Hezbollah militant group, prompting sharp criticism from Tehran.

Tense rhetoric

Ali-Akbar Velayati, senior foreign policy adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, called the disarmament “a dream that won’t come true,” describing it as a policy dictated by Israel and Washington.

“Whatever conclusion it (the Lebanese government) reaches, we will also accept. Those who interfere in Lebanon’s affairs are the ones who give you plans, set timelines for actions, and come from thousands of kilometres away. We have not given you any plans,” he added.

Lebanon’s foreign ministry condemned the comments on X as “a flagrant and unacceptable interference in Lebanon’s internal affairs.”

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun also criticized remarks by Iranian officials, stressing that no group has the right to bear arms or seek foreign support.

“It is forbidden for anyone to bear arms and to use foreign backing as leverage,” Aoun told Larijani during their meeting, according to a statement from the president’s office posted on X.