Slain activist Charlie Kirk praised Iranians, backed nuclear sites attack

Washington said Chinese national Wang Shaoyun and Omani oil trader Mahmood Rashid Amur al Habsi worked with front companies in China, Oman and Turkey to sell sanctioned Iranian oil worth more than $100 million to Chinese state refineries, using the US financial system.

The State Department said the scheme helped fund the Guard’s overseas operations, including support for armed groups.

The Justice Department charged Wang and al Habsi in February with violating US sanctions and conspiring to launder money.

Al Habsi was also placed under Treasury sanctions in 2021, which blocked his assets in US jurisdiction and barred Americans from doing business with him.

The department said al Habsi and his partners used maritime vessels and front companies in Asia and the Middle East to transfer Iranian oil, while also relying on US banks to move money.

The indictment alleges al Habsi secured a $16.5 million loan in 2020 from US firms to buy an oil tanker later used to move sanctioned crude.

The FBI issued a federal arrest warrant for al Habsi in January and described him as having ties to Iran and China. The wanted poster lists him as 40 years old, about 5’11” and 170 pounds, and says he worked as an oil trader.

The State Department said the Revolutionary Guards, a US-designated foreign terrorist organization, has financed attacks globally and does not operate without revenue streams from illicit oil sales.

It urged people with information about Wang, al Habsi, or their networks to contact American authorities.

Howard Solomon, the acting US envoy in Vienna, told the IAEA’s Board of Governors that Iran had “ceased implementing its most basic and fundamental obligations under its safeguards agreement.” He said the board should be “extremely concerned by this near-complete and prolonged loss of required information and access.”

“Iran does not get to pick and choose when and how to implement its legally binding safeguards obligations,” Solomon said. “If Iran’s failure to cooperate with the IAEA continues … this Board will need to be prepared to take further action to hold Iran accountable.”

He noted the agreement announced on Tuesday in Cairo between IAEA chief Rafael Grossi and Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi but stressed: “Immediate and concrete action by Iran is both essential and urgent.”

EU backs Grossi but demands safeguards access

The European Union also welcomed the Cairo accord but said Iran must now deliver full cooperation. “We take positive note of the DG’s statement that this is a step in the right direction. We look forward to further details and to the immediate implementation of the agreement,” the EU said in a statement.

It warned that “the proliferation risk remains profound and urgent,” citing IAEA data that Iran’s stockpile of uranium enriched up to 60% had exceeded 440 kg — “more than 10 significant quantities.”

“We call on Iran to immediately enable the full resumption of the Agency’s in-field verification activities, the conduct of which must be in line with the standard safeguards practice and is therefore non-negotiable,” the EU said.

E3 warn of sanctions clock

The remarks came after France, Germany and Britain told the agency they were “alarmed” by the lack of clarity on Iran’s near-bomb-grade uranium stockpile. “It is not enough for Iran to make promises for tomorrow, we need to see evidence from Iran today,” the E3 said in an open letter.

The three countries last month triggered the UN snapback mechanism, which could restore global sanctions at the end of September unless a new Security Council resolution extends relief.

Grossi described the Cairo agreement as “a step in the right direction,” saying it covered inspections at all declared facilities, including those damaged in June’s strikes. Araghchi, however, said the deal “does not currently allow inspectors into nuclear sites,” and access would be defined only in later talks.

Parliament pushes back

Hosseini-Kia’s remarks reflect a broader backlash in parliament, where lawmakers say the Cairo accord ignores legislation suspending cooperation with the agency. National Security and Foreign Policy Commission member Mohammadreza Mohseni-Sani said inspectors have “no right” to enter Iran until nuclear sites damaged in June’s US and Israeli strikes are restored. “If the 30-day snapback period ends with sanctions restored, we will pursue and approve a plan to leave the NPT,” he warned.

Calls for tougher measures

Some lawmakers have gone further, arguing Iran should no longer limit itself to peaceful nuclear work. Ahmad Bakhshayesh, also on the security commission, told state media Iran should build a bomb because it has already “paid the costs” in the 12-day conflict. “We should have built it long ago,” he said. “We should have built it without leaving the NPT.”

Parliament is already considering a bill to withdraw from the treaty, though former nuclear chief Ali Akbar Salehi has said only Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei can make that decision.

Former officials urge caution

While hardliners demand confrontation, Salehi has struck a different note. The former atomic energy chief called the Cairo accord “positive and a step forward” but warned time is short. “Opportunities are like passing clouds,” he said. “The longer it takes, the more complicated the problem will become.”

‘Cursed agreement’ denounced

Even those who stop short of calling for a bomb or leaving the NPT have used sharp words. Hardline lawmaker Mahmoud Nabavian described Araghchi’s Cairo accord as a “cursed agreement.” On X, he accused Grossi of being “the spy and the cursed one, who caused the martyrdom of hundreds of our commanders, scientists and compatriots.”

Pattern of hostility toward Grossi

The latest attacks on Grossi build on threats voiced earlier this summer. In July, deputy judiciary chief Ali Mozaffari said Grossi could face trial in absentia for “deceptive actions and falsified reports” that Iran claims enabled strikes on nuclear facilities. At the time, a hardline newspaper even called for his execution.

Those comments drew condemnation from Britain, France and Germany, which expressed “full support” for Grossi and the IAEA. European powers last month triggered the snapback mechanism, giving Tehran until later in September to comply or face restored UN sanctions.

Government defends Cairo deal

Despite the criticism, Araghchi insists the Cairo agreement safeguards Iran’s interests. He said it “recognizes Iran’s legitimate security concerns” but “creates no access.” Any inspections, he explained, will only be discussed after Iran submits reports in later talks

“I’ve always believed we should have built it long ago. I’ve always supported building a nuclear bomb because we’ve already paid the costs for it,” national security committee member Ahmad Bakhshayesh told state media on Tuesday.

Bakhshayesh argued that nuclear-armed China is a member of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and that Iran should have taken the same path long ago.

“We should have built it without leaving the NPT,” he added. “We’ve been entangled in this nuclear issue in our country for 25 years now.”

Beijing acceded to the NPT in 1992 but conducted its first nuclear weapons test in 1964. China is one of the five recognized nuclear-weapon states under the agreement, alongside the US, Russia, the UK, and France.

NPT debate in Tehran

Iran maintains that its nuclear program is peaceful.

France, Germany, and the United Kingdom last month triggered the so-called "snapback" mechanism within a 2015 international nuclear deal to which they are party along with Iran, giving Tehran 30 days to comply with the agreement or face restored international sanctions.

Calls have grown inside Iran to withdraw from the NPT in response.

A bill to exit the agreement is under review in the Iranian parliament. Some lawmakers argue the legislature can pass the measure on its own, while former nuclear chief Ali Akbar Salehi said the ultimate decision rests with Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

'No inspection yet'

UN nuclear chief Raphael Grossi on Wednesday inked a deal to pave a way forward on resuming cooperation with Iran alongside its foreign minister Abbas Araghchi at a ceremony in Cairo.

Araghchi later told state TV that the Cairo agreement “recognizes Iran’s legitimate security concerns" and does not by itself reopen facilities to inspectors.

The three European powers said on Wednesday they were alarmed by the lack of clarity on Iran's stockpile of near-bomb-grade uranium and that Tehran must show not claim if it wanted to avoid more sanctions.

“The US government is complicit in these crimes and has no respect or regard for global public opinion or even for its own allies,” Iran’s General Staff of the Armed Forces said in a statement carried by state media.

"Through direct and indirect support for the Zionist regime’s crimes, the United States seeks to create insecurity in the world and the region, promoting international terrorism to advance its sinister, colonial, and exploitative goals," it added.

Israeli warplanes bombed a Hamas office in Doha on Tuesday, in what Israel described as an targeted attack against the group’s senior leadership.

They seemed to miss their intended targets, killing a Qatari security official and five lower-ranking Hamas personnel.

Qatar denounced the attack as “criminal and cowardly,” while Iran called it an “extremely dangerous” violation of sovereignty and international law.

"This was a decision made by Prime Minister Netanyahu, it was not a decision made by me," US President Donald Trump said following the attack. Netanyahu said Israel acted alone and "takes full responsibility."

The US military's Al Udeid Air Base is the largest in the Middle East.

Hamas has long based its political leadership in the gas-rich Persian Gulf state, which has traditionally acted as a mediator in regional conflicts.

'Insane war machine'

Iran’s military also criticized Israel’s wider military campaigns in the region, calling for a united international response.

“There is an urgent need to halt this regime’s insane war machine and for all countries to sever ties with it,” the statement said. Tehran has long been ill at ease with Arab neighbors' improving ties with Israel.

Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates opened formal relations with Israel in the so-called Abraham Accords in 2020, but both condemned the attacks.

Iran's new national security chief Ali Larijani warned neighbors of what he described as Israel's hegemonic ambitions in a post in Arabic on social media on Wednesday.

“The message of the Zionist entity’s recent crime in Qatar is clear: O countries of the region! Prepare yourselves for my coming domination.”

Iran will likely cite the attack as a reason Arab states should beware of Israel, analysts told Iran International.

The Doha strike comes as Iran recalibrates its foreign policy after a June war with Israel and the United States battered its military and nuclear infrastructure.

Iran’s armed forces said support for what it called resistance to Israel around the region, adding it will “defend the defenseless and oppressed people of Palestine and Gaza.”