Iran ready to cut uranium enrichment to 20% to avert another war - Telegraph

The survey of more than 1,500 adults by pollster JL Partners found that 75% of Labour voters and 65% of the wider public back a ban on the IRGC, while only 5% of Labour voters opposed it, the Telegraph reported on Sunday.

Three-quarters of Labour supporters said the group posed a threat to Britain’s national security.

The findings follow MI5 disclosures that security services and police have foiled at least 20 Iran-linked assassination and kidnap plots in Britain over the past two years.

“The British public are rightly under no illusions about the nature of the Iranian regime. It is clearer than ever that the IRGC poses a threat to the safety and security of everyone in Britain,” the Telegraph quoted Labour MP Jon Pearce as saying.

Senior Conservative figures also urged the government to act. Lord Arbuthnot, a former chair of parliament’s defense select committee, was quoted as saying: “With MI5 telling us they have foiled at least 20 state-sponsored attacks by Iran in the UK, what on earth is holding the Government back from proscribing the IRGC?”

The IRGC, a branch of Iran’s armed forces, is already under British financial sanctions, but critics argue those measures are insufficient.

The poll showed that 51% of the public believe sanctions have failed to curb the group’s activities, and 46% doubt authorities are doing enough to counter IRGC-linked operations in the UK.

As an alternative to proscription, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has backed proposals for new legislation to give ministers powers to blacklist state agencies such as the IRGC, the newspaper said.

The poll was commissioned by the Iranian Front for the Revival of Law and National Sovereignty, founded by Vahid Beheshti, a political activist and journalist who has staged a protest for more than 900 days outside the Foreign Office.

The debate in Britain comes as other Western allies have already taken action. The United States designated the IRGC as a foreign terrorist organization in 2019, while Canada added the group to its terrorist list in 2023.

The Israeli military said the strikes hit “military infrastructure of the Houthi terrorist regime” in the Sanaa area, including a military site housing the presidential palace, the Hizaz and Asar power plants, and a fuel storage facility.

Israeli media reported that 10 Air Force jets took part in the strikes in Sanaa, dropping about 35 munitions.

Earlier on Sunday, Israeli media reported that an investigation by the Israeli military found that Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi militant group used a ballistic missile armed with a cluster bomb warhead in its attack on Israel on Friday.

One of the munitions from the strike hit the yard of a house in the central Israeli town of Ginaton, causing minor damage.

The reports said that while an investigation is under way by the Israeli military into the failure to intercept the missile, the probe is not related to the type of warhead it carried.

Reuters reported citing an Israeli Air Force official as saying on Sunday that the missile most likely carried several sub-munitions “intended to be detonated upon impact.”

“This is the first time this type of missile has been launched from Yemen,” the official was quoted as saying.

A day earlier, Ynet wrote that Israeli Air Force is probing why defenses failed to stop Houthi missile that struck near Tel Aviv, and whether it carried cluster munitions like those Iran used in June war.

Such payloads complicate interception and increase the risk of civilian harm.

Five interceptor systems, including THAAD, Arrow, David’s Sling and Iron Dome, engaged the projectile, which initial reviews suggest fragmented in mid-air, Ynet quoted authorities as saying.

Familiar Iranian design

One of the best-known weapons of this type is the Iranian Khorramshahr-4, unveiled in May 2023, with the capacity to scatter dozens of small warheads resembling Grad rockets. Tehran says it can carry a payload of up to two tons over a range of 2,000 kilometers.

During the June war, Iran launched missiles fitted with submunitions designed to disperse small explosives over urban areas to maximize civilian harm.

The Houthis, who control much of Yemen’s population, announced a maritime blockade in the Red Sea in November 2023 after a call by Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to support Hamas in Gaza. Since then, they have fired dozens of ballistic missiles and drones toward Israel.

Most were intercepted, but in May another missile came close to Ben Gurion’s perimeter. The military said its probe would examine how to adapt defenses against cluster-type payloads, which pose a growing challenge as Iran’s allies escalate attacks.

“Those who say, ‘Why don’t you negotiate directly with the United States and solve the issues,’ are superficial; because the reality is different," Khamenei said during a meeting with his supporters in Tehran.

"Given America’s true objective in its hostility toward Iran, these issues are unsolvable."

“The enemies, after facing the steadfast unity of the nation, officials, and armed forces, and after suffering heavy defeats in military attacks, have realized that Iran and the Islamic system cannot be subdued by war or forced into obedience," he said.

Khamenei added that enemies had underestimated Iran’s resilience and wrongly believed attacks would separate the people from the state.

The 86-year-old ruler's remarks came one week after Iran's Reform Front issued a controversial statement urging direct negotiations with Washington, suspension of uranium enrichment, and acceptance of full IAEA monitoring in exchange for sanctions relief.

Regime change

The Supreme Leader, who was absent for 22 days after the June war, accused the United States of preparing for the Islamic Republic's collapse following the June attack.

“On June 13 Iran was attacked; a day later, some American agents met in a European capital to discuss an alternative to the Islamic Republic — that’s how confident they were."

"One day after the attack began, they sat and discussed what government should rule Iran after the Islamic Republic. They even appointed a king, deciding who should be the Shah of Iran. This is how they imagined Iran.”

“They thought this attack would create distance between the people and the system, weaken the system, and allow them to impose their vile and malicious goals,” Khamenei said.

Israel and regional conflict

Khamenei argued that Washington’s enmity was openly acknowledged. “The reason for America’s hostility toward us was revealed by the man in office there today, who said: ‘Our confrontation with Iran, with the Iranian nation, is because Iran must be obedient to the United States.’”

“The Iranian nation is deeply offended by such a grave insult and will stand with full strength against those who hold such a false expectation,” he added.

Turning to Israel, Khamenei said: “Today our enemy, the one standing against us — the Zionist regime — is the most despised government in the world."

He said "the path of aiding the Zionist regime must be cut off, and what the brave people of Yemen are doing today is the right course.”

The Houthis, who control much of Yemen’s population, announced a maritime blockade in the Red Sea in November 2023 after a call by Khamenei to support Hamas in Gaza. Since then, they have fired dozens of ballistic missiles and drones toward Israel as well as commercial vessels navigating the region.

“We are ready for whatever possible for the Islamic Republic,” he continued, pledging readiness to “uproot this deep, malignant cancer [Israel] from the region.”

Abbas Araghchi accused Israel of pursuing expansionist policies in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and Syria, in his opinion piece published Sunday by the London-based Asharq Al-Awsat.

The Iranian official urged international bodies to prosecute Israeli leaders and said the upcoming extraordinary meeting of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in Jeddah must go “beyond issuing statements and words of condemnation.”

At Iran's request, an extraordinary OIC meeting will be held in Saudi Arabia on Monday to discuss the situation in Gaza. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan will chair the meeting, according to the Turkish Foreign Ministry.

“The illusion of Greater Israel is an existential danger and a threat to international peace and security,” Araghchi wrote.

Araghchi also warned OIC states against reliance on initiatives like the Abraham Accords.

“Any doubt, weakness, or illusion based on trust in deceptive promises such as the Abraham Accords will lead to great harm for the Islamic nation,” he wrote.

US President Donald Trump on August 8 said Iran’s nuclear arsenal had been “totally obliterated” and called on Middle Eastern nations to join the Abraham Accords, framing the strikes as a pathway to regional peace.

“Now that the nuclear arsenal being ‘created’ by Iran has been totally OBLITERATED, it is very important to me that all Middle Eastern Countries join the Abraham Accords,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. “This will ensure PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST.”

“We can impose restrictions against the United States, France, Britain and Germany in the Strait of Hormuz and not allow them to navigate,” Hossein Shariatmadari, the representative of Ali Khamenei in the hardline Kayhan newspaper told state broadcaster.

“Just by announcing such a restriction, the oil price will surge to $200, and the biggest economic blow will be dealt to the enemy.”

This is not the first time Shariatmadari has raised the prospect of using Hormuz as leverage. Last year, after European sanctions on Iranian airlines, he urged the closure of the waterway to tankers and cargo ships from “hostile countries.”

At the time, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Iran had not issued such a threat despite acknowledging it had the capacity to do so.

Other Iranian officials returned to the theme after US strikes on nuclear facilities earlier this year.

Closing the strait would be disastrous for Iran itself, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned in June.

“If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake. It’s economic suicide for them,” he said, urging China to pressure Tehran against such a move.

Any Iranian closure of Hormuz would be “extremely dangerous,” European Union’s foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said in June, while UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy described it as “a monumental act of self-harm, making a diplomatic solution even harder.”

Global artery under strain

The Strait of Hormuz carries about one-fifth of the world’s oil exports. Iran has never attempted a full closure, but it has disrupted shipping through repeated seizures of commercial vessels.

“Europe and the United States would get miserable” if Tehran restricted oil flows, the Revolutionary Guards–linked Javan newspaper wrote in July, citing a shipping industry figure.

“Even countries with no link to the Iran-Israel war will suffer losses.”

The paper added that greater instability in the Middle East would drive up shipping and insurance costs globally.

Iran’s military loaded naval mines onto vessels in the Persian Gulf after Israeli strikes in June, though the mines were not deployed, according to Reuters.

US officials said the move indicated Tehran was weighing a serious escalation that could cripple global commerce.

Iran’s parliament approved a measure to close the strait in June following US airstrikes, state media reported, though the measure was not binding.